Case Results

Grand Theft Charges Reduced

When a client faced 15 years in prison for second-degree felony Grand Theft charges, they recruited the help of Erika Valcarcel.

The client allegedly broke into a vehicle and stole highly-valued tools. The State had to prove that the missing tools were in excess of $20,000 to prosecute the client with a second-degree felony.

During discovery review, we found various issues with the valuation of the missing tools and concluded that they were not in excess of $20,000. Through intense negotiation, the client’s charges were reduced to a third-degree felony. The client was also granted probation on the condition that they pay back an agreed amount for the missing tools.

Due to attorney Valcarcel’s diligence and attention to detail, she helped the client avoid a substantial prison sentence.

The outcome of an individual case depends on a variety of factors unique to that case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any similar or future case.

No Jail for Client Charged with a Probation Violation

While a client was on probation for Sale of Controlled Substances, they were accused of violating their curfew. With the thought of facing up to 5 years of prison time, the client contacted Erika Valcarcel.

We skillfully negotiated with the State by providing documentation that the client had earned a college degree and had been working a full time job during their probation.

After successful negotiations, we helped the client avoid jail time and they were ordered to complete extra community service instead.

The outcome of an individual case depends on a variety of factors unique to that case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any similar or future case.

Petit Theft Charges Dropped

When a client faced one year in jail for first-degree charges of Petit Theft, they contacted Erika Valcarcel for help.

The client allegedly took items without paying by failing to scan items at a self checkout at Walmart. The client insisted that this was an honest mistake and we supported this claim with the fact that they had no criminal record.

After fierce negotiation with the State, they agreed to drop charges if the client completed a class and community service hours.

By dropping a first-degree charge to essentially a slap on the wrist, our client was able to avoid jail time and a criminal record.

The outcome of an individual case depends on a variety of factors unique to that case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any similar or future case.

DUI Charges Reduced to Reckless Driving

After a client was arrested for a DUI, they faced jail time, fines, increased insurance rates, and several other potential consequences. This led them to reach out to Erika Valcarcel for assistance.

We immediately contacted the state regarding their DETER program, which could reduce a DUI charge to reckless driving if the program is completed. We argued that since it was the client’s first offense, no aggravating factors existed, and the client cooperated with law enforcement, they should be eligible for the program.

Upon completing the program, the client’s charges were reduced to reckless driving. On top of that, we helped the client keep their driver’s license throughout the process.

The outcome of an individual case depends on a variety of factors unique to that case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any similar or future case.

Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon Charges Dismissed

When a client was facing third-degree felony charges for Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon, they quickly contacted Erika Valcarcel to avoid a potential punishment of 5 years in jail.

The client was accused of threatening her husband of many years with a kitchen knife; however, these alleged facts were not accurately reported.

The husband contacted our office and signed a waiver of prosecution stating that he did not want to go forward with the case. We then submitted a waiver to the State Attorney’s office arguing that without the alleged victim’s testimony, there was no evidence of a crime. This resulted in a full dismissal of the client’s charges.

The outcome of an individual case depends on a variety of factors unique to that case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any similar or future case.

No Jail for Employee Charged with Theft

Attorney Valcarcel recently helped a client accused of taking money from her employer on several occasions. This led to very serious charges for engaging in a scheme to defraud. As a third-degree felony, she was looking at up to five years in prison and her employer was adamant that she receive jail time as part of her sentence.

By negotiating with the prosecutor and arguing that it would be impossible for our client to repay her employer from jail, the state agreed to probation as long as she pays restitution, attends a theft diversionary class, and completes a mental health evaluation. This allowed her to avoid an almost assured jail sentence and put an unfortunate situation behind her.

The outcome of an individual case depends on a variety of factors unique to that case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any similar or future case.

Domestic Violence Charges Dismissed in 10 Days

When a client was arrested for battery after an altercation with his girlfriend, he immediately contacted attorney Erika Valcarcel. The client was adamant that the entire situation was a misunderstanding, but nevertheless he was looking at a domestic violence conviction and potentially up to a year in jail.

We acted fast on his behalf and discussed the situation with the State attorney’s office. We informed the prosecutor that our client’s girlfriend did not want to proceed and highlighted the weaknesses in their case.

Once they were aware of these developments, we successfully arranged to have the charges dismissed. This was all before our client’s first court date and impressively all done within 10 days of the initial arrest.

The outcome of an individual case depends on a variety of factors unique to that case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any similar or future case.